Across the completed round, average forecast error fell from 0.2306 at Opening to 0.2226 at Closing. Lower OA Score means more accurate forecasts. The comparison covers all 10 matches and 100 comparisons of Opening and Closing forecasts for the same bookmaker and match. The overall gain is clear; the team-level detail reveals its exceptions.

Hull's closing prices told a less convincing story

Across Hull City's 10-match window, every operator's Closing forecasts fared worse than its own Opening forecasts. Betclic illustrates the pattern. The Closing Improvement Index (CII) measures accuracy gained or lost between Opening and Closing: a negative reading means the Closing forecast produced more error.

Brentford offered the opposite picture: Pinnacle's Closing forecasts were more accurate than its Opening forecasts. Both selected cases cover 10 matches, with Opening and Closing compared on the same fixtures. These team-level figures cover recent matches beyond Matchweek 8, so they describe a broader pattern than the round's overall average.

Two teams, opposite closing signals

Hull City / Betclic - CII
-0.0165
OA Score
Brentford / Pinnacle - CII
0.0085
OA Score

Unibet and Winamax were moving apart

Everton offers a different contrast. The Team Accuracy Index (TAI) compares an operator's forecast error with the market benchmark for matches involving that team. Unibet's Closing TAI fell from 0.0016 to -0.0016; Winamax's rose from 0.0012 to 0.0030.

Unibet crossed below the benchmark's error level, while Winamax moved further above it. Yet Unibet's own closing forecasts still trailed its opening forecasts, with an Everton CII of -0.0011. Beating the market average and improving your own forecast are separate tests. An operator can do better than its peers on average while doing worse than it did at Opening.

A Sunday switch, with the round still complete

Liverpool-Brighton moved from Saturday to Sunday following Brighton's European scheduling commitments. The rearranged fixture remained part of Matchweek 8, which is now complete.

Sources and methodology